Dream Act continues a long Maryland tradition of welcoming immigrants

On Election Day, voters will have the opportunity to continue the state’s long tradition of welcoming new Americans and valuing education by supporting the Maryland Dream Act at the polls.

A “For” vote on Question 4 will affirm the law signed by Gov. Martin O’Malley that provides in-state tuition to students who were brought to the U.S. at a young age, have been here for at least three years, graduate from high school in Maryland, and whose parents pay their taxes.

The students must attend a community college for two years before entering one of the state’s public four-year colleges or universities.

Only a filibustering Senate prevented the passage of a Federal Dream Act in 2010, which would have granted permanent residency to people brought to the U.S. as young children, and who know no other country than this one.

Supporting the Maryland Dream Act will provide students the hope of earning a four-year degree, which will be beneficial not only for them, but for the state as a whole.

Recognizing that Maryland has one of the highest rates of immigrants with post-secondary degrees in the country, and the benefits are readily evident, a report by the Governor’s Commission to Study the Impact of Immigrants in Maryland supported access to post-secondary education for resident immigrants, regardless of their legal status. The commission also found that people with more education are good for society because they earn more money and are more engaged in the community, and are better-informed workers, consumers and voters.

The argument that Dream Act students will take spots from incoming freshman at Maryland state universities is unfounded because the law requires such students to take 60 credit hours or graduate from a Maryland community college before transferring to a four-year institution.

By passing the Dream Act, Maryland would join 12 other states that have instituted similar laws.

Nowhere is this more evident than Arizona, where the author of its immigration bill and speaker of the Arizona house was defeated in a special recall election this year. Local communities, school systems, and businesses in these states have rebelled against the legislatures for harming their economies and showing them in a negative light nationally and internationally.

As the nation begins to recognize that positive, comprehensive immigration solutions are needed, Maryland voters can follow in the state’s long tradition of recognizing the importance of its immigrants to their economy and cultural live by supporting Question 4.

This entry was posted in 2012, Border Bulletin. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s